Comments on: Strip News (12/26/08) http://artpatient.com/2008/12/26/strip-news-122608/ webcomic news, webcomic reviews and commentary Fri, 11 May 2012 14:14:37 +0000 hourly 1 By: delos http://artpatient.com/2008/12/26/strip-news-122608/comment-page-1/#comment-131 delos Mon, 05 Jan 2009 00:12:12 +0000 http://www.artpatient.com/?p=694#comment-131 That's right. duh. The first art book I saw it in approximated it to .66 of the picture area and that always sticks in my head. Reminder: research first THEN open mouth. :) That’s right. duh. The first art book I saw it in approximated it to .66 of the picture area and that always sticks in my head.

Reminder: research first THEN open mouth. :)

]]> By: fluffy http://artpatient.com/2008/12/26/strip-news-122608/comment-page-1/#comment-130 fluffy Sun, 04 Jan 2009 21:20:52 +0000 http://www.artpatient.com/?p=694#comment-130 It's by the very definition of the golden ratio. It’s by the very definition of the golden ratio.

]]> By: delos http://artpatient.com/2008/12/26/strip-news-122608/comment-page-1/#comment-129 delos Sun, 04 Jan 2009 20:16:19 +0000 http://www.artpatient.com/?p=694#comment-129 LOL. That's a true spiral, indeed. Not many of us would have dared to try something like that. I've never seen a comic presented in alternating perpendicular fashion. This comic even kept its clarity very nicely as it turned and shrunk. How did you arrive at 61.8% reduction? Was it trial and error or did you calculate it out? LOL. That’s a true spiral, indeed. Not many of us would have dared to try something like that.

I’ve never seen a comic presented in alternating perpendicular fashion. This comic even kept its clarity very nicely as it turned and shrunk.

How did you arrive at 61.8% reduction? Was it trial and error or did you calculate it out?

]]>