<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Strip News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://artpatient.com/2008/11/21/strip-news-15/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://artpatient.com/2008/11/21/strip-news-15/</link>
	<description>webcomic news, webcomic reviews and commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 17:02:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Strip News 1-9-9 &#124; What-Did-I-Learn? &#124; ArtPatient &#124; ArtPatient</title>
		<link>http://artpatient.com/2008/11/21/strip-news-15/comment-page-1/#comment-612</link>
		<dc:creator>Strip News 1-9-9 &#124; What-Did-I-Learn? &#124; ArtPatient &#124; ArtPatient</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 11:11:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artpatient.com/?p=440#comment-612</guid>
		<description>[...] editing from MPD57. (I have some comments below the article which rehash my viewpoint I stated here, fourth point from the bottom, but the other commenters have interesting things to say.) Helpfully, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] editing from MPD57. (I have some comments below the article which rehash my viewpoint I stated here, fourth point from the bottom, but the other commenters have interesting things to say.) Helpfully, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Strip News 1-9-9 &#8212; ArtPatient.com</title>
		<link>http://artpatient.com/2008/11/21/strip-news-15/comment-page-1/#comment-96</link>
		<dc:creator>Strip News 1-9-9 &#8212; ArtPatient.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 22:43:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artpatient.com/?p=440#comment-96</guid>
		<description>[...] editing from MPD57. (I have some comments below the article which rehash my viewpoint I stated here, fourth point from the bottom, but the other commenters have interesting things to say.) Helpfully, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] editing from MPD57. (I have some comments below the article which rehash my viewpoint I stated here, fourth point from the bottom, but the other commenters have interesting things to say.) Helpfully, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: delos</title>
		<link>http://artpatient.com/2008/11/21/strip-news-15/comment-page-1/#comment-95</link>
		<dc:creator>delos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 21:52:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.artpatient.com/?p=440#comment-95</guid>
		<description>Aoede,
That&#039;s a good and interesting point and I&#039;m glad you brought it up. It&#039;s not bad that readers like to read comics. On the contrary, it is a very good thing. It hadn&#039;t occurred to me to drill down on that point.

The article that served as the basis for my comment was pretty down on comics, saying they would never appeal to &#039;viewers&#039; as opposed to &#039;readers.&#039; One could say that some comics are designed to appeal more to viewers -  like newspaper style gag strips or even comic books. Graphic novels and manga books might appeal more to readers, perhaps.

I also don&#039;t think people fall neatly into one or the other category. Under different circumstances I do both and I&#039;m sure that&#039;s the same for everyone else.

I can easily imagine someone liking Superman comics but being bored with Copper - and the opposite being true as well. While some comics (many of my favorites) do require a reader&#039;s sensibility to really get the material, I don&#039;t see most comics demanding that and the article I linked makes a blanket statement that comics are (and always will be) just for readers.

Does that help explain my statement a little better?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aoede,<br />
That&#8217;s a good and interesting point and I&#8217;m glad you brought it up. It&#8217;s not bad that readers like to read comics. On the contrary, it is a very good thing. It hadn&#8217;t occurred to me to drill down on that point.</p>
<p>The article that served as the basis for my comment was pretty down on comics, saying they would never appeal to &#8216;viewers&#8217; as opposed to &#8216;readers.&#8217; One could say that some comics are designed to appeal more to viewers &#8211;  like newspaper style gag strips or even comic books. Graphic novels and manga books might appeal more to readers, perhaps.</p>
<p>I also don&#8217;t think people fall neatly into one or the other category. Under different circumstances I do both and I&#8217;m sure that&#8217;s the same for everyone else.</p>
<p>I can easily imagine someone liking Superman comics but being bored with Copper &#8211; and the opposite being true as well. While some comics (many of my favorites) do require a reader&#8217;s sensibility to really get the material, I don&#8217;t see most comics demanding that and the article I linked makes a blanket statement that comics are (and always will be) just for readers.</p>
<p>Does that help explain my statement a little better?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

